Clarifying user intent

I'm considering the context surrounding the Liga Profesional and Copa de la Liga in Argentina for 2023-2024, noting possible changes by the AFA. Rather than fabricating details, I could offer to find an article and summarize it. However, I need to confirm if the user wants me to proceed, as their request is somewhat ambiguous. Maybe I should ask if they want a quick summary of what's known or if they'd prefer that I find the source and translate it.Explaining league changes

I’m thinking about how to structure my response regarding recent changes in the Argentine league. I can outline key points like what changed, why it's controversial, its potential impact, and reactions. I should ask the user if they want me to track down the original French report for details and provide a translation or just a general explanation.

Additionally, I'll clarify what "regular season champion" means and explain how the league structure works, noting discontent among different teams. I could also offer to fetch sources if the user is interested.Preparing concise response

I'm thinking about how it’s important to avoid heavy formatting in my response while keeping it concise. Since the user's text is in Chinese, I should reply in the same language, using simple bullet points. I want to ensure that the final output is clear and easy to read without any unnecessary code or shell formatting. I’ll focus on crafting my response carefully to meet these criteria.